IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 18, 2009
JAMES BRYANT PHIFER, PLAINTIFF,
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, DEFENDANT.
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action alleging housing discrimination. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).
On February 2, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed timely objections, and defendant has filed a timely reply.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 2, 2009, are adopted in full;
2. Defendant's July 21, 2008 motion to dismiss with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Doc. No. 15) is granted; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.