Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Spurling v. Brinks

March 20, 2009

RICHARD SPURLING, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BRINKS, INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, DEFENDANT



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Stephen Larson

[Assigned to Hon. Stephen Larson]

Judgment on Special Verdict

This action came on regularly for trial on February 17, 2009, in the United States District Court, Central District of California - Eastern Division, Hon. Stephen Larson presiding; the plaintiff appearing by attorneys, Michael Eisenberg, Michael Kopple, and Joseph Socher of Eisenberg & Associates and the defendant appearing by attorneys, James Kellett and Jonathan Moskowitz of Crowell & Moring.

A jury was regularly impaneled and sworn. Witnesses were sworn and testified. Thereafter, jurors were duly instructed by the Court and the cause was submitted to the members of the jury, with directions to return a verdict on special issues. The jury deliberated and thereafter returned into court.

We, the members of the jury in the case entitled Spurling v. Brink's, Inc., answer the questions submitted to us as follows:

RETALIATION FOR REFUSAL TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL DISCRIMINATION

1. Was Plaintiff, Richard Spurling, asked to terminate Sabrina Gadsden on account of her race?

X Yes ___No If your answer to question 1 is "yes," then answer question 2. If you answered "no," continue with question 5.

2. Did Plaintiff, Richard Spurling, refuse to terminate Sabrina Gadsden on account of her race?

X Yes ___No If your answer to question 2 is "yes," then answer question 3. If you answered "no," continue with question 5.

3. Was Richard Spurling's refusal to terminate Sabrina Gadsden on account of her race a motivating factor in Defendant Brinks' decision to terminate him?

X Yes ___No If your answer to question 3 is "yes," then answer question 4. If you answered "no," continue with question 5.

4. Was Brinks' termination of Richard Spurling a substantial factor in causing ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.