Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hernandez v. Harrison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 20, 2009

ARMANDO HERNANDEZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WARDEN HARRISON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable James V. Selna United States District Judge

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Medical Training Assistant Parga, R.N. Donnelly, Dr. Fortaleza, R.N. Fernandez and Dr. Ofoegbu (the "Joint Motion"), the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Dr. Cassim ("Defendant Cassim's Motion"), plaintiff's Opposition to the Joint Motion/ Request for Continuance ("Rule 56(f) Request"), all of the other documents submitted by the parties in connection with the pending motions, and all of the records herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) Request is denied; and (2) the Joint Motion and Defendant Cassim's Motion are granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on plaintiff and on defendants' counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090320

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.