Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Buesgens v. Hart

March 27, 2009

MICHAEL L. BUESGENS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BEVERLY HART, ET AL., DEFENDANTS



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

The Court is in receipt of plaintiff's "Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 201(d)," filed March 25, 2009, by which plaintiff requests the Court take judicial notice of three "facts" that allegedly pertain to an ongoing proceeding plaintiff instituted against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") before the United States Merit System Protection Board. The motion is hereby DENIED, because the instant case is closed. Further, even assuming there is some type of controversy between plaintiff and the EEOC regarding one or more of the three "facts", this Court lacks jurisdiction to review such controversy in the context of the instant closed case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090327

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.