Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Buesgens v. Hart

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 27, 2009

MICHAEL L. BUESGENS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BEVERLY HART, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

The Court is in receipt of plaintiff's "Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts Federal Rules of Evidence - Rule 201(d)," filed March 25, 2009, by which plaintiff requests the Court take judicial notice of three "facts" that allegedly pertain to an ongoing proceeding plaintiff instituted against the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") before the United States Merit System Protection Board. The motion is hereby DENIED, because the instant case is closed. Further, even assuming there is some type of controversy between plaintiff and the EEOC regarding one or more of the three "facts", this Court lacks jurisdiction to review such controversy in the context of the instant closed case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090327

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.