Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

White v. Marshall

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 31, 2009

RORY RENIA WHITE, PETITIONER,
v.
JOHN C. MARSHALL, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Petitioner has requested a 90-day extension of time to file a traverse pursuant to the court's order of December 18, 2008, because he is evidently in the process of being transferred and anticipates not being reunited with his personal property for an extended period. Petitioner also notes that respondent was granted an extension of time to file a response to the petition. The court will permit petitioner a 60-day extension of time to file a traverse. Should petitioner not have access to his personal legal property for more than 45 days, he may seek a further, and limited, extension at that time.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's March 20, 2009 request for an extension of time (Docket # 14) is partially granted; and

2. Petitioner is granted sixty days from the date of this order in which to file a traverse.

20090331

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.