UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 3, 2009
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
GOMEZ ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Gary Allen Feess
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Renee Fisher None N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Proceedings: (In Chambers)
ORDER REMANDING CASE
On February 23, 2009, this Court ordered Defendants to show cause why the present action should not be remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and untimely removal. (2/23/2009 Order (Docket No. 3) at 2.) In that Order, the Court explained that the bare allegations in Defendants' notice of removal do not satisfy Defendants' burden of proving that the present lawsuit satisfies the $75,000 amount-in-controversy requirement set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). (Id. at 1--2.) The Court also stated that Defendants' failure to file a timely response to the Court's Order would be treated as consent to remand the case to state court. (Id. at 2.) Finally, the Court questioned whether a live controversy even exists in this case, given that the state court docket reveals that the state court entered a judgment on the pleadings in Plaintiff's favor on February 2, 2009. (Id.)
Defendants have failed to respond to the Court's Order to Show Cause, and have therefore failed to meet their burden of proving that Plaintiff's lawsuit satisfies the $75,000 amount-in-controversy requirement. Accordingly, to the extent that a live controversy exists in this case, the case is REMANDED to Los Angeles Superior Court for further proceedings. The February 23, 2009 Order to Show Cause is VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.