The opinion of the court was delivered by: Percy Anderson United States District Judge
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The court agrees with the conclusions of the magistrate judge.
Below, plaintiff contended she is unable to work primarily due to disabling pain from rheumatoid arthritis (see Transcript of Record, "TR", 50, 383-90), though here she does not dispute the ALJ's finding that this disease is now controlled by medication. (TR 20.) Here, the gravamen of her plea is that the ALJ did not adequately account for the number of times she must use the bathroom daily. However, his residual functional capacity ("RFC") limitation specifically provided for ready access to bathrooms. (TR 22.)
Even this limitation was generous in view of the RFC assessments of a consultative examining and reviewing physician, which included no such limitation. (TR 20, 151-56, 143-50.) Indeed, the ALJ found plaintiff's claims about the extent of her limitations was not credible, noting: "[plaintiff] has not been hospitalized, treated at an emergency room, undergone extensive medical workups, or received restorative therapy." (TR 21.)
To the extent plaintiff now contends the ALJ should have asked her specifically how many times a day she needs to use the restroom, the court disagrees. The ALJ was not required to augment plaintiff's testimony about topics he discounted as not credible, particularly when plaintiff's counsel was provided and effectively declined the opportunity to do so.
Furthermore, the record suggests a history of alcohol abuse, which further diminishes plaintiff's allegations of disability due to diarrhea. (See, e.g., TR 155)
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
1. The report and recommendation is accepted.
2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.
3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...