Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Real Property Located at 8617 South Sun Bar Ranch Place

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 8, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8617 SOUTH SUN BAR RANCH PLACE, VAIL, PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, APN: 205-75-11504, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, DEFENDANTS.
JOHN W. HOLLIS AND JUDITH L. HOLLIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEES OF THE THREE EIGHT TRUST, CLAIMANTS.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

The matter before the Court is attorneys Janet Sherman and Eric Honig's (collectively, "Attorneys'") Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record in this matter for John W. Hollis and Judith L. Hollis (collectively, "Claimants") pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(d) and State Bar Rule 3-700(C)(1)(f). In their motion, Attorneys request leave of court to withdraw as counsel because Claimants have failed to pay legal fees.*fn1

According to Local Rule 83-182(d), "an attorney who has appeared may not withdraw leaving the client in propria persona without leave of Court upon noticed motion and notice to the client and all other parties who have appeared." Further, an attorney seeking to withdraw under Local Rule 83-182(d) "shall provide an affidavit stating the current or last known address or addresses of the client and the efforts made to notify the client of the motion to withdraw." E.D. Cal. L.R. 83-182(d). A motion to withdraw as attorney of record is governed by the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California. Id.

The decision to grant or deny an attorney's motion to withdraw as counsel is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. LaGrand v. Stewart, 133 F.3d 1253, 1269 (9th Cir. 1998).

After reviewing the record and the reasons for withdrawal noted by Attorneys, the Court concludes that there is good cause to grant Attorneys' Motion to Withdraw as Counsel. The Claimants are no longer able to pay their legal fees. The Court further concludes that the withdrawal will not unduly prejudice Claimants or unduly delay resolution of the case because this matter is currently stayed. Furthermore, Claimants have consented to Attorneys' withdrawal. Accordingly, Attorneys' Motion to Withdraw as Counsel is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.