UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 9, 2009
BRENT BEASLEY, ERNEST GLASCOW, BILL PETERS, RAUL MELENDEZ, TRUSTEES OF THE UNION ROOFERS SUPPLEMENT ANNUITY TRUST, UNION ROOFERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, UNION ROOFERS ADMINISTRATIVE FUND, UNION ROOFERS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND, PLAINTIFFS,
NIELCO ROOFING AND SHEET METAL, INC., DBA NIELCO ROOFING, A UTAH CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Margaret A. Nagle United States Magistrate Judge
(Complaint Filed October 8, 2008)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
The court, having read and considered the Stipulation for Order re Confidential Information ("Stipulation"), regarding the protection of Confidential Information, and good cause appearing in that discovery in this action will be facilitated thereby,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation, as modified by the Court, is entered in this action without prejudice to any motion for further modification. The parties are cautioned, however, that their Stipulation and this related Order, in and of themselves, create no entitlement to file under seal information, documents, or things designated as Confidential Information by the parties. Accordingly, reference to the Stipulation or the Order, or to the parties' designation of any information, document, or thing as Confidential Information, is wholly insufficient to warrant filing under seal. Good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal, and the parties' mere designation of any information, document, or thing as Confidential Information does not -- without the submission of evidence establishing the confidential nature of the material sought to be filed under seal -- establish good cause.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.