UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 9, 2009
TRINIDAD GOMEZ, PLAINTIFF,
PENA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS
Plaintiff Trinidad Gomez ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.
On February 9, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations herein which was served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objection to the Findings and Recommendations was to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file a timely Objection to the Findings and Recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed February 9, 2009, is adopted in full;
2. This action shall proceed on Plaintiff's complaint, filed February 8, 2008, against Defendants Tyner and Daguman for violation of the Eighth Amendment; and
3. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Pena, C/O Doe (Pena's partner), Edmond, Smith, Harris, R. Vogel, CSP pharmacy, Melendez; Amaya, Poblete, Cabatu, Renteria, Zoher Mina, N. Grannis, and the specialist at Bakersfield Pain Center are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.