Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kumar v. China Airlines

April 9, 2009

MANISH KUMAR, NARENDRA KUMAR, MONICA KUMAR, AND SAVITRI SRIVASTAVA, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CHINA AIRLINES, DEFENDANT



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO WITHDRAW AUTOMATIC ADMISSIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS

The Plaintiffs' motion to withdraw automatic admissions and the requesting of attorney fees came on for hearing before this court, Jeffrey D. Bohn appearing for Plaintiffs' and ____ appearing for defendant.

After consideration of the briefs and arguments of counsel, and all other matters presented to the court:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to withdraw automatic admissions is GRANTED and Plaintiff's motion for monetary sanctions is DENIED.

Plaintiffs shall file corrected admissions within 30 days of the filing date of the Memorandum Decision.The parties shall confer within the week to prepare for the initial Scheduling Conference; Counsel for Plaintiffs shall prepare and lodge a form of order consistent with the Memorandum Decision within five (5) court days of service of the Memorandum Decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090409

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.