Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bridgewater v. Lockart

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 13, 2009

KEITH RUBEN BRIDGEWATER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LOCKART, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 38). In his motion, plaintiff states that he served interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admissions on defendants. Copies of the discovery requests are attached to the motion. Plaintiff asks the court to order defendants to "answer fully," to "produce for inspection all requested Documentation," and "that all 'REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS' be answered in their entirety." He does not, however, provide any indication of how defendants responded to his discovery requests or provide any argument as to how any particular response is inadequate. For this reason, it is impossible for the court to evaluate plaintiff's motion to compel or to grant any relief.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 38) is denied.

20090413

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.