IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 14, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
MICHAEL DOUGLAS CARLIN, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Susan Illston United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING
On March 27, 2009, the parties appeared before the Court in the above-referenced matter and advised the Court that they needed time to attempt to negotiate a resolution of this matter.
The Court scheduled the next appearance for Friday, April 17, 2009 at 11:00 am. The parties have made progress in those negotiations, but have yet to reach a final resolution. The parties anticipate that they will be able to resolve the matter if given a short continuance. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and agree that the next appearance in this matter be continued to May 1, 2009 at 11:00 am.
The parties also request that the Court exclude the period of time from the date of this Order through May 1, 2009 from any time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The parties 26 represent that granting the continuance provides the reasonable time necessary for preparation of defense counsel. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties also agree that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Based on the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the next appearance in the above-captioned matter is continued to May 1, 2009 at 11:00 am and the time until then is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.