Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ernst v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 14, 2009

TED KEENER ERNST, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MATTHEW CATE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

(Docs. 5, 11 & 13)

On January 30, 2009, Defendant Matthew Cate moved to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion was amended on February 20, 2009, and again, on February 23, 2009. Rather than oppose the motions, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on April 7, 2009, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 15(a). An amended complaint supercedes the original complaint, and this Court treats Plaintiff's original complaint as withdrawn. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, this Court DENIES as moot Defendant's motions to dismiss Plaintiff's original complaint (Docs. 5, 11 & 13).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090414

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.