Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mercado v. Sandoval

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 15, 2009

MOISES MERCADO; AND MARCO A. RAMIREZ, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
SANDOVAL, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; MARCHINI LAND CO., A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP; BRUNO P. MARCHINI, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MARCHINI LAND CO.; RICHARD B. MARCHINI, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MARCHINI LAND CO.; VINCENT M. MARCHINI, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MARCHINI LAND CO.; AND ROSETTA MARCHINI, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A MARCHINI LAND CO., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

On April 9, 2009, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order in which they seek to continue their agreed upon deadline for filing initial disclosures, which was set by the parties in their Joint Status Report filed on January 20, 2009. However, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(C), "a different time" for initial disclosures may be "set by stipulation or court order."

Since the parties' April 9, 2009 stipulation agrees to set a different time for initial disclosures, and the parties have not shown the necessity for a court order approving that stipulation, their request for a court order is denied.

20090415

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.