Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Coley v. Cassim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 17, 2009

ANDREW CALVIN COLEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DR. CASSIM, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: George Foley, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff's Request for Rescheduled Telephonic Conference (Dkt. #53)

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Request for Rescheduled Telephonic Conference (Dkt. #53), filed April 1, 2009.

On February 5, 2009, the Court held a telephonic status conference, which Plaintiff was unable to attend due to medical issues. (See Minutes from Telephonic Conf., Dkt. #44). At the telephonic conference, the Court indicated that it would issue a written scheduling order, setting a 90 day discovery period. (See Scheduling Order, Dkt. #43). Thereafter, Plaintiff requested an additional telephonic conference and a clarification of the scheduling order. (See Dkt. #s 43, 45). The Court issued an Order of Clarification Regarding Discovery Deadlines on March 16, 2009 and indicated the Court would grant an additional telephonic conference if the parties required additional clarification. (Dkt. #51) (emphasis added).

Plaintiff now submits an additional conference request, but fails to identify any need for a status conference. (Dkt. #53). Accordingly, . . . . . . . . .

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Request for Rescheduled Telephonic Conference (Dkt. #53) is DENIED.

20090417

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.