UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SOUTHERN DIVISION
April 21, 2009
LEONARD J. PORTO III, PLAINTIFF,
CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH, CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH MARINE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, MARINE SAFETY CHIEF MARK KLOSTERMAN, LIFEGUARD TRAVIS LOWREY, LIFEGUARD THOMAS MCGERVEY, LIFEGUARD MIKE SCOTT, CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE OFFICER ALFRED COLLAZO, POLICE OFFICER RYAN DOMINGUEZ, POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL DONOHUE, POLICE OFFICER ZACH MARTINEZ, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. David O. Carter United States District Judge
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL AND JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS
Plaintiff Leonard J. Porto III ("Porto") filed his Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief on May 14, 2008, naming the City of Laguna Beach ("City") as the only Defendant. The City filed an Answer denying the material allegations.
Pursuant to leave granted by this Court, Porto later filed a First Amended Complaint for Damages, Declaratory Relief and Injunctive Relief on September 22, 2008, naming the City and several City departments and employees as Defendants (collectively, "City Defendants"). The City Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Action under Fed. Rule Civ. P. 12(b)(6). On November 19, 2008, this Court entered a Minute Order granting the City Defendants' motion.
On December 9, 2008, Porto filed a Second Amended Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief against the City Defendants. The City Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Action under Fed. Rule Civ. P. 12(b)(6). On January 20, 2009, this Court entered a Minute Order granting in part and denying in part the City Defendants' motion. The motion was granted as to all claims for relief against all the City Defendants with the exception of the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim of excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment alleged against Defendant Police Officer Michael Donohue ("Donohue") in his individual capacity.
Donohue filed an Answer denying the material allegations. Donohue later filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. On April 20, 2009, this Court filed an Order granting the motion.
All issues in this action having been fully considered, and decisions on those issues having been duly rendered,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Porto taking nothing by his action, that the action be dismissed with prejudice and judgment entered on the merits in favor of the City Defendants, and each of them, and that the City Defendants recover their costs, as determined by the Clerk.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.