IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SACRAMENTO DIVISION)
April 24, 2009
CYTOSPORT, INC., PLAINTIFF,
VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., DEFENDANT.
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PAGE-LIMIT EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
PLAINTIFF'S STIPULATED PAGE-LIMIT EXTENSION
WHEREAS, the Court, in its November 5, 2008 Order, ordered that all reply briefs should be limited to ten (10) pages;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff CytoSport, Inc. ("CytoSport") desires a page extension for its reply brief to Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s ("VPX") Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction ("VPX's Opposition") due to the complexity and number of issues involved in VPX's Opposition, the seriousness of the motion for preliminary injunction, and the length of VPX's Opposition, which was 40 pages;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between CytoSport and VPX, by and through their respective attorneys of record, that CytoSport may file a reply brief to VPX's Opposition of up to thirty two (32) pages in length.
DATED: April, 24, 2009
THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, L.L.P. Peter M. de Jonge Gordon K. Hill Jed H. Hansen THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, L.L.P. -and- Mark M. Bettilyon Samuel C. Straight RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER P.C. -and- MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP Attorneys at Law Jed H. Hansen. Attorneys for Plaintiff CytoSport, Inc.
Ramsey M. Al-Salam Gigi C. Hoang Jason A. Yurasek PERKINS COIE, LLP -and- Erica W. Stump VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Erica W. Stump . (as authorized on April 24, 2009) Attorneys for Defendant Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
IT IS SO ORDERED,
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.