Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Johnson v. T&S Business Corp.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 27, 2009

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
T&S BUSINESS CORPORATION, D/B/A IHOP #649; KANTILA J. MADHVANI; DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

The parties' Joint Status Report filed April 9, 2009, states that "Plaintiff consents to having this case tried before a magistrate judge" and "Defendants believe this matter would be appropriately tried before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)."

Therefore, if the Magistrate Judge accepts the referral, this action is reassigned to the Magistrate Judge on the date this Order is filed. See Local Rule 73-305(b) (prescribing "notwithstanding the consent of all parties, the [United States District] Judge or Magistrate Judge may reject the referral.").

ACCEPTANCE OF REFERRAL

Pursuant to the parties' consent and the approval of the United States District Judge, I accept reassignment of this action for all further proceedings, including entry of final judgment. All documents hereafter filed shall be denominated as 2:09-cv-0180-DAD.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090427

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.