Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Johnson v. T&S Business Corp.

April 27, 2009

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
T&S BUSINESS CORPORATION, D/B/A IHOP #649; KANTILA J. MADHVANI; DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

The parties' Joint Status Report filed April 9, 2009, states that "Plaintiff consents to having this case tried before a magistrate judge" and "Defendants believe this matter would be appropriately tried before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)."

Therefore, if the Magistrate Judge accepts the referral, this action is reassigned to the Magistrate Judge on the date this Order is filed. See Local Rule 73-305(b) (prescribing "notwithstanding the consent of all parties, the [United States District] Judge or Magistrate Judge may reject the referral.").

ACCEPTANCE OF REFERRAL

Pursuant to the parties' consent and the approval of the United States District Judge, I accept reassignment of this action for all further proceedings, including entry of final judgment. All documents hereafter filed shall be denominated as 2:09-cv-0180-DAD.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090427

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.