IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 29, 2009
BEE YANG PETITIONER,
CATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.
On February 4, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
Although it appears from the file that petitioner's copy of the findings and recommendations were returned as undeliverable, this court notes that he was properly served. It is the petitioner's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times.
Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 4, 2009 are adopted in full;
2. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.