Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Freeman v. Sisto

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


April 29, 2009

CLIFTON FREEMAN, PETITIONER,
v.
D. K. SISTO, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: A John L. Weinberg United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Clifton Freeman has filed a new application to proceed IFP and a petition challenging the Board of Parole Hearing's denial of parole on March 27, 2007. (See Dkt. Nos. 27 and 28). These documents were inadvertently docketed in this case, which focuses upon denial of parole at an earlier hearing. Petitioner did not title his petition as an amendment to his prior petition; and nothing in the new petition suggests it was intended as an amendment. The new petition should have been filed and docketed as a new case.

Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to open a new case, re-docket petitioner's application and petition, and assign the case in accordance with standard procedures.

20090429

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.