Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Noble v. Adams

May 1, 2009

STEVEN JOSEPH NOBLE IV, PLAINTIFF,
v.
D. ADAMS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY COURT WHETHER A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Steven Noble ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed on May 12, 2003, against Defendants Cuevas and Adams. There have been three summary judgment motions filed in this case which were denied in part. The only cause of action remaining is Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment access to exercise claims beginning January 31, 2002 through July 31, 2002. The court is willing to conduct a settlement conference if the parties believe it would be beneficial. Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff and Defendants shall file a written response to this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090501

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.