IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 4, 2009
RALPH JAMES PEREZ, PETITIONER,
M. MARTEL, RESPONDENT.
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is the only party to the proceeding at this time. He has paid the filing fee and consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must conduct a preliminary review of any habeas petition and determine whether it is plain that the habeas petitioner is not entitled to relief. If so, the habeas petition must be dismissed.
An application for writ of habeas corpus can only be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 based upon an allegation that the petitioner is in custody in violation of the Constitution or other federal law. 28 U.S.C. §2254(a). Petitioner does not challenge the fact that he is in custody or the duration of his confinement. Instead, he takes issue with a state court finding that he failed to exhaust administrative remedies as to a prison disciplinary proceeding challenge.
See Pet. at 1-21.*fn1 Because this court has no basis upon which to grant petitioner relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254, this action must be dismissed.*fn2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. §2254 is dismissed.