IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 5, 2009
CHRISTINE EARL, PLAINTIFF,
NIELSEN MEDIA RESEARCH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
A number of discovery disputes are pending before the court, having been submitted on a letter brief. See Docket Nos. 55, 56, 58, 59 (motions to compel); Docket No. 70 (order); Docket Nos. 82-2 (revised letter brief). Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
1. Plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents (Docket No. 56) is granted in part. Within fifteen days from the date of this order, defendant shall produce responsive documents; the temporal scope may be limited to five years prior to plaintiff's termination; only documents relating to claims of age or disability discrimination need be produced.
2. The scope of questioning plaintiff seeks pertaining to the deposition of person most knowledgeable (PMK) Sowatzke is fairly encompassed within the deposition notice. See Docket No. 82-2 at 2. Deponent PMK Sowatzke shall testify regarding other employees' history of discipline and clerical errors committed by recruiters.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.