Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ingram v. Joint Union High School District

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 6, 2009

CHADERICK A. INGRAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.
CHADERICK A. INGRAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.
CHADERICK A. INGRAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.
CHADERICK A. INGRAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.
CHADERICK A. INGRAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER OF NON-RELATED CASES GRANT

The undersigned judge declines to relate the above-captioned cases pursuant to Local Rule 83-123(a). Assignment of the matters to the same judge is not likely to effect a substantial savings of judicial effort or other economies. These actions involve the same plaintiff, same or similar defendants, but the actions involve events specific to each party, the questions of fact are different, the questions of law are not novel, it is not clear that the same result should follow in these actions, and assignment to different judges would not entail substantial duplication of labor.

Therefore, CIV. S-08-2545 LKK DAD PS, CIV. S-08-2546 GEB DAD PS, CIV. S-08-2547 LKK EFB PS, and CIV. S-08-2683 GEB DAD PS shall not be reassigned to the undersigned judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090506

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.