The opinion of the court was delivered by: David O. Carter, U. S. District Judge
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. MAY 12 2009
X WITH COUNSEL Robert Carlin, DFPD
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO
There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Count 1 of the Indictment: 18 U.S.C. § 1708: Possession of Stolen Mail
The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100.00, which is due
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $8,157.30, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A.
The amount of restitution ordered shall be paid as follows:
Bank of America $1,114.33
Chase Bankcard Services $1,700.00
CitiBank Fraud Investigations $5,200.00
If the defendant makes a partial payment, each payee shall receive approximately proportional payment unless another priority order or percentage payment is specified in this judgment.
Restitution shall be due during the period of imprisonment, at the rate of not less than $25 per quarter, and pursuant to the Bureau of Prisons' Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. If any amount of the restitution remains unpaid after release from custody, nominal monthly payments of at least $25 shall be made during the period of supervised release. These payments shall begin 30 days after the commencement of supervision. Nominal restitution payments are ordered as the court finds that the defendant's economic circumstances do not allow for either immediate or future payment of Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(3)(A), interest on the restitution ordered is waived because the defendant does not have the ability to pay interest. Payments may be subject to penalties for default and delinquency pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
The defendant shall be held jointly and severally liable with convicted coconspirator Stephen James Hunter (Case No. SACR05-00004-DOC) for the amount of restitution ordered in this judgment.
The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.
All fines are waived as it is found that the defendant does not have the ability to pay a fine in addition to restitution.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Paul Vahid Evans, is hereby committed on the Single-Count Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term
It is further ordered that the defendant only be released to the U.S. Marshals Service or a United States Probation Officer who is ordered to transport defendant to the designated residential re-entry center when a bed becomes
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years under the following terms and conditions:
1. The defendant shall reside for a period not to exceed 6 months in a residential re-entry center (RRC) under the community corrections component, as directed by the Probation Officer, and shall observe the rules of that facility. Subsistence fee is waived as the Court finds the defendant does not have the ability to pay.
2. The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318, including the condition that the defendant shall not commit any ...