Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wright v. Runnels

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 12, 2009

DOMINIC WRIGHT, PETITIONER,
v.
D.L. RUNNELS, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

Petitioner is a prisoner without counsel who sought habeas corpus relief in this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). On November 30, 2005, the assigned magistrate judge found there was no basis for granting relief and recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. On January 30, 2006, the assigned district judge adopted that recommendation and denied the petition. Judgment was entered accordingly. Notwithstanding that judgment, on May 4, 2009, petitioner filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Good cause has not been shown for submitting a motion for appointment of counsel after judgment has been entered.

Accordingly, the May 4, 2009, motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

The court notes that it will issue no response to future filings by petitioner in this action not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

So ordered.

20090512

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.