Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Harris v. City of Fresno

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 12, 2009

ROBERT HARRIS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF FRESNO, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge

ORDER RE DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPT EXCERPTS

In opposition to Defendant City of Fresno's pending motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, summary adjudication (Doc. 25), Plaintiff's counsel submitted a declaration (Doc. 38-2) to which counsel attached, as exhibits, excerpts from the deposition of Robert Harris (Plaintiff), Neil Montgomery, Robert Little, and Lon Martin. Defendant City of Fresno objects to the transcripts as not properly authenticated in that the transcript excerpts are not accompanied by a reporter's certification.*fn1 Consistent with Rule 56(e)(1), the court will permit Plaintiff's counsel to supplement his declaration as stated below.

Plaintiff's counsel has until 3:00 p.m. on May 13, 2009, to electronically file a supplemented declaration that includes the same deposition testimony accompanied by the reporter's certifications. No courtesy copies to the court are required.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.