The opinion of the court was delivered by: Philip S. Gutierrez, U. S. District Judge
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 5 11 2009
X WITH COUNSEL Teresa C. Alarcon, retained counsel
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO
There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:
33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a) and 1319(c)(1)(A) - Negligent Discharge of Pollutants Into a Publicly-Owned Treatment Works as charged in the Single-Count Information; and
18 U.S.C. § 2(b) - Causing an Act to be Done as charged in the Single-Count Information.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $25, which is due immediately.
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall pay to the United States a total fine of $10,000, which shall bear interest as provided by law.
The fine shall be paid in full no later than 90 days from the date of judgment.
The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, IT IS THE JUDGMENT of the Court that the defendant, Yvonne Dolby, is hereby placed on probation on Count One of the Single-Count Information for a term of three (3) years under the following terms and conditions:
1. The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
2. During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and fine in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment; and
3. The defendant shall apply monies received from income tax refunds greater than $500, lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to any outstanding court-ordered financial obligation.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
The defendant is advised of her right ...