Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States ex rel Hendow v. University of Phoenix

May 14, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. MARY HENDOW AND JULIE ALBERTSON, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, DEFENDANT.



ORDER

This case came before the court on May 1, 2009, for hearing on relators' motion to compel further Rule 30(b)(6) deposition testimony (Doc. No. 270). Michael Rubin appeared for the relators. Jared Toffer appeared for defendant.

For the reasons stated in open court, defendant's motion to compel further Rule 30(b)(6) deposition testimony (Doc. No. 270) was granted in part and denied in part. In this regard, the court granted the motion to compel further Rule 30(b)(6) deposition testimony with respect to: Topic 1 as limited by plaintiff in the joint statement for the time period 2000 to February 5, 2004; Topic 2 to the extent defendant maintains such information in a pre-existing form; and as to Topic 3 only to the extent defendant has previously offered to make a person most knowledgeable available as to certain areas covered by this topic and no further. In all other respects the motion to compel further Rule 30(b)(6) deposition testimony (Doc. No. 270) was denied.

IT IS ORDERED.

20090514

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.