Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wakefield v. Schwarzenegger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 15, 2009

DARRYL WAKEFIELD, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER (Doc. 8) TWENTY-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Darryl Wakefield is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 27, 2009, Plaintiff was ordered by the undersigned to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Plaintiff sought reconsideration, but his motion was denied on April 15, 2009. To date, Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order of March 27, 2009.*fn1

Accordingly, Plaintiff shall show cause within twenty (20) days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. The failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.