Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Juarez v. Alameda

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 15, 2009

MANUEL JUAREZ, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ALAMEDA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lawrence J. O'Neill United States District Judge

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ADDRESSING SETTLEMENT ISSUE WITHIN THREE COURT DAYS

(Doc. 147)

On May 5, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to file pretrial statements in compliance with the Court's order of September 24, 2008. Defendants filed a response on May 7, 2009, and Plaintiff filed a response on May 13, 2009. In his response, Plaintiff indicates that the parties are currently discussing settlement.

Defendants are HEREBY ORDERED to file a supplemental brief within three (3) court days addressing whether or not the parties are currently engaged in settlement negotiations and whether Defendants believe settlement in this matter is likely.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090515

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.