Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Noble Systems Corp. v. Howell
May 15, 2009
NOBLE SYSTEMS CORP., PLAINTIFF,
v.
CHRIS HOWELL D/B/A IMPACT MARKETING, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell Jr. United States District Judge
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CHRIS HOWELL d/b/a IMPACT MARKETING TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER [Local Rule 6-144] Original Complaint Filed: March 16, 2009
[Assigned to The Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Courtroom]
COME NOW Plaintiff Noble Systems Corp. and Defendant Chris Howell d/b/a Impact Marketing, through their respective counsel of record, and pursuant to Local Rule 6-144, do hereby represent to the Court and stipulate as follows:
1. Pursuant to stipulation filed on April 16, 2009, Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due May 15, 2009;
2. The parties are engaged in settlement negotiations and would like to explore the possibility of settlement before Defendant is required to respond to the Complaint;
3. The parties have agreed that Defendant will have an additional twelve days, through and including May 27, 2009, to answer or otherwise respond to
Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled matter, and request that the Court enter its Order granting this additional extension of time.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...