Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Noble Systems Corp. v. Howell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -- SACRAMENTO DIVISION


May 15, 2009

NOBLE SYSTEMS CORP., PLAINTIFF,
v.
CHRIS HOWELL D/B/A IMPACT MARKETING, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell Jr. United States District Judge

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CHRIS HOWELL d/b/a IMPACT MARKETING TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER [Local Rule 6-144] Original Complaint Filed: March 16, 2009

[Assigned to The Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Courtroom]

COME NOW Plaintiff Noble Systems Corp. and Defendant Chris Howell d/b/a Impact Marketing, through their respective counsel of record, and pursuant to Local Rule 6-144, do hereby represent to the Court and stipulate as follows:

1. Pursuant to stipulation filed on April 16, 2009, Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due May 15, 2009;

2. The parties are engaged in settlement negotiations and would like to explore the possibility of settlement before Defendant is required to respond to the Complaint;

3. The parties have agreed that Defendant will have an additional twelve days, through and including May 27, 2009, to answer or otherwise respond to

Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled matter, and request that the Court enter its Order granting this additional extension of time.

DATED: May 14, 2009

It is so ordered.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

20090515

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.