Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Escoto v. Foremost Superior Marble

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 28, 2009

GERARDO ESCOTO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
FOREMOST SUPERIOR MARBLE, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Defendants' motion to compel came on regularly for hearing May 27, 2009. Adam Wang and Adam Pedersen appeared telephonically for plaintiffs. Jeremy Naftel appeared for defendants. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The motion to compel is granted. No later than May 29, 2009, plaintiffs shall provide verified responses, without objections, to the interrogatories; responsive documents also shall be produced, without objection. If plaintiffs, after a diligent search, are unable to locate documents responsive to a particular category of documents, then a statement signed by plaintiff's counsel, describing the search and specifically identifying the categories of documents for which no documents could be found, shall be provided to defendants.

2. Reasonable expenses incurred in connection with this motion are awarded to defendantsagainst plaintiffs in the amount of $4,918.88.

20090528

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.