The opinion of the court was delivered by: Andrew J. Guilford U. S. District Judge
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. June 1 2009
X WITH COUNSEL Leon Peterson, DFPD
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Possession of Counterfeit Currency, in violation of 18 USC §472 as charged in Count 1 of the Single Count Indictment.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of:
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due
All fines are waived as it is found that the defendant does not have the ability to pay a fine.
Restitution is ordered in the amount of $350 as follows: $50 to Impress'd Clothing, $150 to Chuckwa, $100 to Banana Republic, $50 to Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf. If the defendant pays a portion of the restitution, it shall be distributed among the various victims in proportion to their respective amount of losses.
Under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Ronald Golden, is hereby committed on Count 1 of the Indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of time served (release #D8513 written).
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of 3 years under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment.
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
During the term of supervised released, The defendant may travel as necessary in the performance of job duties on the condition that he notify his probation officer.
In addition to the special conditions of supervision imposed above, it is hereby ordered that the Standard Conditions of Probation and Supervised Release within this judgment be imposed. The Court may change the conditions of supervision, reduce or extend the period of supervision, and at any time during the supervision period or within the maximum period permitted by law, ...