The opinion of the court was delivered by: James V. Selna U. S. District Judge
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER MONTH DAY YEAR
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. JUNE 01 2009
WITH COUNSEL Harriet Leva, Rtd.
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea. NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Corruptly Influencing Testimony in an Official Proceeding in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. 1512(b)(1), as charged in the Single Count Indictment.
The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of: six (6) months on the Single Count Indictment.
It is ordered that the defendant pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, which is due immediately.
It is ordered that the defendant pay to the United States a total fine of $250.00, which is due immediately.
The defendant shall comply with General Order 01-05.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Jerry Anderson, is hereby placed on probation on Count 1 of the Single-Count Indictment for a term of six (6) months under the following terms and conditions:
1. The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 318;
2. During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and fine in accordance with this judgment's order pertaining to such payment; and
3. The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
The defendant is advised of his right to appeal.
Defendant's Bond is exonerated.
In addition to the special conditions of supervision imposed above, it is hereby ordered that the Standard Conditions of Probation and Supervised Release within this judgment be imposed. The Court may change the conditions of supervision, reduce or extend the period of supervision, and at any time during the supervision period or within the maximum period permitted by law, may issue a warrant and revoke supervision for a violation occurring during the supervision period.
It is ordered that the Clerk deliver a copy of this Judgment and Probation/Commitment Order to the U.S. ...