Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ogundimo v. Steadfast Property & Informational Development

June 1, 2009

CARLOTTA OGUNDIMO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
STEADFAST PROPERTY & INFORMATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DEEMING PLAINTIFF'S PLEADING FOR RECONSIDERATION (Doc. 28) TO BE A STATEMENT AND NOT A MOTION ORDER TO PLAINTIFF

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action for damages and other relief concerning alleged civil rights violations. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rules 72-302 and 72-304.

I. Document No. 28

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's pleading, filed on May 26, 2009 (Doc. 28), in which Plaintiff refers to an earlier order but in which Plaintiff does not apply for a court order. Plaintiff's document is not a motion, and thus the docketing of Plaintiff's paper as such was erroneous.

Instead, it appears that Plaintiff was making a statement concerning material that Plaintiff had attached to her complaint.

II. Informational Order to Plaintiff

Parties to this litigation shall take note of the following requirements, and Plaintiff is directed specifically to take note of paragraph six concerning evidence in the action:

In litigating this action, the parties must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California ("Local Rules"). This order highlights specific rules of which the parties should take particular note. Failure to comply with the Local Rules, federal rules or a court order, including this order, will be grounds for dismissal, entry of default or other appropriate sanctions. See Local Rule 11-110; F.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

1. Documents intended to be filed with the Court must be presented or mailed to the Clerk of the Court. See Local Rule 5-134(a). All documents improperly mailed to a judge's chambers will be stricken from the record.*fn1 A document requesting a Court order must be styled as a motion. See F.R.Civ.P. 7.

2. Each document submitted for filing must include the original signature of the filing party or parties. Local Rule 7-131; F.R.Civ.P. 11(a). All documents submitted without the required signature(s) will be stricken. Each separate document must be separately stapled. See Local Rule 7-130. If a document is stapled behind another document, it will not be filed and will not be entered on this Court's docket.

3. All documents filed with the Court must be submitted with an additional legible conformed copy for the Court's use. See Local Rule 5-133(d)(2). A document submitted without an extra copy for the Court's use will be stricken. If the filing party wishes the Court to return a file-stamped copy, he or she must include an additional copy for that purpose (i.e., submit an original and two copies, one for the Court's use and one to be returned). The Court cannot provide copy or mailing service for a party , even for an indigent plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis. Therefore, if the filing party wishes a file-stamped copy returned, the party must also provide an envelope with adequate postage pre-paid. Copies of documents from the Court file may be obtained at the cost of 50 cents per page.

4. After any defendants have appeared in an action by filing a pleading responsive to the complaint (i.e., an answer or a motion to dismiss), all documents filed with the Court must include a certificate of service stating that a copy of the document was served on the opposing party. See F.R.Civ.P. 5; Local Rule 5-135(c). A proof of service shall be under penalty of perjury and shall include the date, manner, and place of service. Id. A document submitted without the required proof of service will be stricken . Where a party is represented, service on the party's attorney of record constitutes effective service.

5. All filings must bear the file number assigned to the action, followed by the initials of the District Court Judge and the Magistrate Judge to whom the case is assigned. Where plaintiff simultaneously pursues more than one action, he or she must file separate original documents and the appropriate number of copies in each action to which the document pertains. Documents submitted listing more than one case number in the caption will be stricken.

6. The Court cannot serve as a repository for the parties' evidence. The parties may not file evidence with the Court until the course of litigation brings the evidence into question (for example, on a motion for summary judgment, at trial, or when requested by the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.