UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 2, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge
RECOMMENDATION TERMINATING SUPERVISED RELEASE PRIOR TO EXPIRATION DATE
On April 17, 2002, the above-named was sentenced to 120 months custody in the Bureau of Prisons to be followed by a term of Supervised Release for a period of 36 months, which commenced on October 20, 2006. Special conditions included: Warrantless search; Financial disclosure; Credit restrictions; Drug and alcohol treatment program; Co-payment for treatment program; Pager/cell phone restrictions; and $100 special assessment.
SUMMARY OF COMPLIANCE
Ms. McNealey has complied with all conditions and special conditions of Supervised Release, and has not been involved in any further criminal activities. It is the opinion of the probation officer that Ms. McNealey has derived maximum benefit from supervision and is not in need of continued supervision.
It is, therefore, respectfully recommended that Supervised Release in this case be terminated early.
RICHARD W. ELKINS Senior United States Probation Officer
Dated: May 11, 2009
Elk Grove, California
DEBORAH A. SPENCER Supervising United States Probation Officer
cc: AUSA (To be assigned) (Pursuant to Rule 32, notice of proposed relief to the supervisee is being provided. If no objection is received from you within 14 days, the probation officer's Recomm endation and Prob 35-Order Term inating Supervised Release Prior to Expiration Date, will be submitted to the Court for approval.)
On October 20, 2006, the above-named was placed on Supervised Release for a period of 36 months. She has complied with the rules and regulations of supervision. It is accordingly recommended that she be discharged from supervision.
ORDER OF COURT is ordered that the supervised releasee be discharged from Supervised Release, and that the proceedings in the case be terminated.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.