Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ndulue v. Fremont-Rideout Health Group

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 3, 2009

CHUKWUEMEKA NDULUE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE FREMONT-RIDEOUT HEALTH GROUP; SUTTER NORTH MEDICAL GROUP, PC; DEL NORTE CLINICS, INC.; THE PEACH TREE CLINIC, INC; LEONARD MARKS, M.D.; PUSHPA RAMAN, M.D.; CHERRY ANN WY, M.D.; ARUM KUMAR, M.D.; HARRY WANDER, M.D.; MAX LINS, M.D.; AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES

The Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines entered into by all Parties is hereby accepted by the Court; and

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDED THAT the parties shall disclose experts and produce reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) no later than November 5, 2009.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the parties shall disclose experts offered for rebuttal purposes only and produce reports from the rebuttal witnesses in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) no later than December 10, 2009.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT all discovery, including depositions for preservation of testimony, is left open, save except that it shall be so conducted as to be completed by February 2, 2010. The word "completed" means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relevant to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge's calendar in accordance with local rules of the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California and so that such motions may be heard (and resulting orders obeyed) no later than February 2, 2010.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT all other dates designated as deadlines by the Court in its Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order will remain as they are discussed in the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order.

20090603

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.