Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hanif v. Solano County Jail Medical Staff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 3, 2009

RAHIM AHMAD HANIF, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SOLANO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a county jail inmate presently confined at Napa State Hospital proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 19, 2009, plaintiff filed a document which the court construes as a request to stay this action during the pendency of plaintiff's placement at Napa State Hospital. On May 20, 2009, defendants filed a statement of non-opposition to the request. Defendants request that the stay be for a specific period of time and they suggest a period of six months.

After review of the record, and good cause appearing, this action will be stayed for a period of six months. At the conclusion of six months, or upon plaintiff's transfer from Napa State Hospital to a correctional facility, whichever is first, either party may file a request to lift the stay. Defendants' April 21, 2009 motion for summary judgment will be denied without prejudice to its renewal, as appropriate, after the stay is lifted. The deadlines set in the court's March 27, 2009 scheduling order will be vacated and reset, as appropriate, at such time as the stay of this action is lifted.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's May 19, 2009 motion for extension of time is construed as a request to stay this action and, so construed, is granted;

2. Either plaintiff or defendants or both may file a request to lift the stay within six months from the date of this order or upon plaintiff's transfer from Napa State Hospital to a correctional facility, whichever is sooner;

3. Defendants' April 21, 2009 motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to its renewal, as appropriate, after the stay is lifted;

4. The deadlines for completion of discovery and filing dispositive motions set in the court's March 27, 2009 order are vacated; and

5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this action.

20090603

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.