Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Plizga v. GMAC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 4, 2009

VICTOR PLIZGA, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
GMAC, GMAC MORTGAGE, MORTGAGE, ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. ("MERS"), ETS SERVICES, LLC., AND DOES 1-50, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

On April 17, 2009, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (Docket No. 11) and a motion to strike (Docket No. 12). However, on May 19, 2009, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 14), which is now the operative pleading. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner and Co. 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (stating an amended complaint supersedes the prior complaint). Since the pending motions do not address the operative pleading, they are denied as moot.

20090604

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.