This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E. D. Cal. L. R. ("Local Rule") 72-302(c)(21).
Plaintiff requests authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis, and has submitted the affidavit required thereunder which demonstrates that she is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security thereof. Accordingly, plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the court is directed to dismiss a case filed pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute if, at any time, it determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant.
A complaint must set forth "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Bell Atlantic Corporation v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 554, 562-563 (2007). In reviewing a complaint under this standard, the court must accept as true the allegations of the complaint, Hospital Bldg. Co. v. Rex Hosp. Trustees, 425 U.S. 738, 740 (1976), construe the pleading in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and resolve all doubts in the plaintiff's favor, Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1969). While pro se pleadings must be liberally construed, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), the pleading requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must be met, and "require a complaint to include a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief," "in order to 'give the defendant fair notice of what . . . the claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.'" Bell Atlantic Corp., supra, 550 U.S. at 555 (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)).
The instant complaint alleges that plaintiff suffered permanent injury as a result of her employer's failure to provide a physically adequate work setting (keyboard), and was thereafter denied medical leave to which she was entitled, resulting in unexcused absences, which in turn served as the rationale for defendant's alleged harassment, retaliation and wrongful termination of plaintiff. Liberally construed, the complaint meets the standards noted above and appears to support prima facie claims of, inter alia, employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation and wrongful termination, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.; the federal Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seq.; the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"), Cal. Gov't Code. §§ 12940 et seq.; the California Family Rights Act ("CFRA"), Cal. Gov't Code § 12945.2; and the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 (equal rights),1981a (damages for intentional employment discrimination). Review of these and plaintiff's other claims can await further development of the record and the responsive pleadings of defendant.
Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summons forthwith pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
3. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, a copy of the file endorsed complaint, this court's "Order Requiring Joint Status Report," and the forms providing notice of the magistrate judge's availability to exercise jurisdiction for all purposes, and the court's voluntary dispute resolution program.
4. Plaintiff is advised that the U.S. Marshal will require:
a. One completed summons;
b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant;
c. A copy of the file endorsed complaint for each defendant, with an extra copy for ...