UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 5, 2009
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
BANK OF SACRAMENTO, DEFENDANT.
BANK OF SACRAMENTO, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable John A. Mendez United States District Judge
ORDER ON BANK OF SACRAMENTO'S MOTIONS TO STAY AND STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS Date: May 20, 2009 Time: 9:00 a.m. Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez Courtroom: 6
Bank of Sacramento's Motion to Stay filed in Case No. 2:09-cv-00766 JAM KJM, Bank of Sacramento's Motion to Stay filed in Case No. 2:09-cv-00771 JAM KJM, and Stewart Title Guaranty Company's motion to dismiss filed in Case No. 2:09-cv-00771 JAM KJM all came on for hearing on May 20, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. in this Court. Counsel for Bank of Sacramento and for Stewart Title Guaranty Company were in attendance and presented oral arguments on the Motions to Stay. Having considered the parties' papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, oral argument, and other pleadings and papers on file herein, the Court hereby GRANTS Bank of Sacramento's Motions to Stay for the reasons stated by the Court on the record at the hearing.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Bank of Sacramento's Motions to Stay these actions is GRANTED, and these actions are hereby stayed until final resolution of Andrews Dixon, LLC v. Bank of Sacramento et al., Solano County Superior Court Case No. FCS030940.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court does not reach Stewart Title Guaranty Company's Motion to Dismiss filed in Case No. 2:09-cv-00771 JAM KJM. Stewart may renew its Motion after expiration of the stay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.