Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Stockton East Water District v. United States

June 6, 2009

STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; BUREAU OF RECLAMATION; DIRK KEMPTHORNE, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; ROBERT JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER OF THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION; MICHAEL FINNEGAN, REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION'S MID-PACIFIC REGION, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

AMENDMENTS TO SCHEDULING ORDER

On May 29, 2009, the Plaintiff filed a "Consensual Application for Leave of Court to Modify Pretrial Scheduling Order," and proposed to modify the pretrial scheduling order with regards to discovery cut-off and motion practice dates.

Since the parties agree to a modification of the Rule 16 Scheduling Order, and modification can be made without adversely affecting the undersigned judge's trial docket, the modification will be granted; however, other prescribed scheduling dates will also be modified to accommodate the essence of the parties' request.

Therefore, the Rule 16 Scheduling Order is modified as follows:

(1) all discovery shall be completed by October 26, 2009;

(2) the last hearing date for motions shall be October 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m.; and,

(3) the final pretrial conference is rescheduled to commence at 3:30 p.m. on December 21, 2009.*fn1

The trial scheduled to commence at 9:00 a.m. on February 9, 2010, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.