Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Cardoso

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 8, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TROY L. CARDOSO DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME

The parties request that the status conference in this case be continued from June 11, 2009 to July 2, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. They stipulate that the time between June 11, 2009 and July 2, 2009 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4. Specifically, the defense is still performing its investigation in this matter. The defense has hired a computer forensic expert who requires additional time to analyze the computer seized from the defendant during the execution of the search warrant. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

Respectfully Submitted, LAWRENCE G. BROWN Acting United States Attorney

DATE: June 8, 2009

HEIKO P. COPPOLA Assistant U.S. Attorney

DATE: June 8, 2009

Dwight M. Samuel*fn1

DWIGHT M. SAMUEL Attorney for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.