Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lam v. Hartley

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 9, 2009

MIGUEL MARIO LAM, PETITIONER,
v.
J. D. HARTLEY, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO PETITION (Doc. 11)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On May 28, 2009, respondent filed a motion to extend time to file an answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 11). As grounds therefor, Respondent cites delays in receiving documents from the state courts that are necessary to the preparation of a response. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Respondent's motion for extension of time (Doc. 11), is GRANTED. Respondent is granted thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order in which to file an answer to the petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090609

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.