Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kashani v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 15, 2009

MATTHEW KASHANI, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TYLER ADAMS; PAUL PHIPPS, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia U.S. Magistrate Judge United States District Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING DATES

Defendant Tyler Adams filed an Ex Parte Application requesting a continuance of all dates in the case for a period of at least four or preferably six months. Defendant cites his service of the Amended Complaint in April 2009 and his need to do discovery to establish "mitigated damages." Mr. Adams conceded liability in his Answer. In fact, he answered the Complaint in this case in February 2009, and the current schedule was set by the Court on March 4, 2009.

Defendant's application fails to state what specific discovery is necessary and why it cannot be completed by the current July 20, 2009 discovery cut off. Based on a failure to show good cause, defendant's application is herewith denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090615

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.