Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Johnson v. Lightfoot

June 16, 2009

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL K. LIGHTFOOT, ET. AL. DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON and DefendantS DAVID MECHAM, individually and dba LEGAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.; DINA THOMAS, individually and dba EMPIRE HOME LOAN CORPORATION; MICHAEL LIGHTFOOT, individually and dba SACRAMENTO RIVER MORTGAGE; LES CORBIN; and THADDEUS POTOCKI, individually and dba ABC CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, by and through the undersigned, that the parties have agreed to an extension of time to respond to the complaint. Defendant will now have until June 19, 2009 to file a responsive pleading with this court.

Dated: June 16, 2009

PORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Jennifer E. Duggan

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090616

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.