Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Johnson v. Lightfoot

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 16, 2009

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL K. LIGHTFOOT, ET. AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON and DefendantS DAVID MECHAM, individually and dba LEGAL RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.; DINA THOMAS, individually and dba EMPIRE HOME LOAN CORPORATION; MICHAEL LIGHTFOOT, individually and dba SACRAMENTO RIVER MORTGAGE; LES CORBIN; and THADDEUS POTOCKI, individually and dba ABC CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, by and through the undersigned, that the parties have agreed to an extension of time to respond to the complaint. Defendant will now have until June 19, 2009 to file a responsive pleading with this court.

Dated: June 16, 2009

PORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Jennifer E. Duggan

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090616

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.