Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lugo v. Walker

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 23, 2009

RUSTY LUGO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WALKER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff has consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed May 1, 2009, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days from the date of this action, plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

20090623

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.