IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 23, 2009
JAYSEN J. TURNER, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
ACRC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
By order filed April 30, 2009, plaintiffs' amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his amended complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.
Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the reasons given in the April 30, 2009, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.